California Files

Findings

What stands out on the face of the statements and the campaign reports. Each one says why, what to check, and the rule it rests on, with the official text. None of them is a finding of wrongdoing.

Tina Simone McKinnor Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $929,113 paid at their request since 2024: 8 sources ($112,500) also gave $60,300 to their campaign; 23 sources ($407,113) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Olson Remcho, LLP ($71,113 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta; lobbyist employer); AT&T Services Inc. ($66,000 to 101 Enterprises Foundation, LA County Delegation Foundation; gave $11,800 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); State Building & Construction Trades Council of California ($50,000 to LA County Delegation Foundation; lobbyist employer); Altria Client Services, LLC ($45,000 to LA County Delegation Foundation; lobbyist employer); AIDS Healthcare Foundation ($20,000 to LA County Delegation Foundation; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Olson Remcho, LLP paid $71,113 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta · registered lobbyist employer
  • AT&T Services Inc. paid $66,000 to 101 Enterprises Foundation, LA County Delegation Foundation · gave $11,800 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • State Building & Construction Trades Council of California paid $50,000 to LA County Delegation Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Altria Client Services, LLC paid $45,000 to LA County Delegation Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • AIDS Healthcare Foundation paid $20,000 to LA County Delegation Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Faculty Association paid $15,000 to LA County Delegation Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • TikTok paid $15,000 to LA County Delegation Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Elevance Health, Inc. paid $15,000 to LA County Delegation Foundation · gave $1,500 to the campaign
  • Clean Power Alliance paid $15,000 to LA County Delegation Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Target Corporation paid $13,500 to LA County Delegation Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • CA Broadband & Video Association paid $10,000 to LA County Delegation Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • CA State Council of Service Employees paid $10,000 to LA County Delegation Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • and 13 more on the person's page
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

John S Laird Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $29,000 paid at their request since 2024: 2 sources ($0) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Qualcomm ($0 to Equality California Institute; lobbyist employer); Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc. ($0 to Equality California Institute; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Qualcomm paid $0 to Equality California Institute · registered lobbyist employer
  • Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc. paid $0 to Equality California Institute · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Aisha Wahab Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $60,500 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($5,000) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Sutter Health ($5,000 to Sourewise; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Sutter Health paid $5,000 to Sourewise · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Akilah F. Weber Pierson Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $4,847,972 paid at their request since 2024: 44 sources ($1,476,614) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Pacific Gas and Electric Company ($215,000 to California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute; lobbyist employer); Novo Nordisk Inc ($105,000 to California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute; lobbyist employer); Guardant Health ($90,000 to CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS POLICY INSTITUTE, California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute; lobbyist employer); Olson Remcho, LLP ($71,114 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta; lobbyist employer); BNSF Railway Company ($70,000 to California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Pacific Gas and Electric Company paid $215,000 to California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute · registered lobbyist employer
  • Novo Nordisk Inc paid $105,000 to California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute · registered lobbyist employer
  • Guardant Health paid $90,000 to CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS POLICY INSTITUTE, California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute · registered lobbyist employer
  • Olson Remcho, LLP paid $71,114 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta · registered lobbyist employer
  • BNSF Railway Company paid $70,000 to California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute · registered lobbyist employer
  • Visa paid $70,000 to California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute · registered lobbyist employer
  • Davita paid $65,000 to California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute · registered lobbyist employer
  • Altria Client Services paid $50,000 to California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute · registered lobbyist employer
  • Oportun, Inc. paid $40,000 to CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS POLICY INSTITUTE, California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute · registered lobbyist employer
  • MICROSOFT paid $40,000 to California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Commerce Club, Inc. paid $40,000 to California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Alliance of Family Owned Businesses paid $35,000 to California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute · registered lobbyist employer
  • and 13 more on the person's page
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Alex Tinming Lee Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $577,597 paid at their request since 2024: 2 sources ($6,500) also gave $11,130 to their campaign; 8 sources ($209,558) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: California Nurses Association ($100,000 to Legislative Progressive Caucus Center; lobbyist employer); Olson Remcho, LLP ($32,058 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta; lobbyist employer); California Teachers Association ($25,000 to Legislative Progressive Caucus Center; lobbyist employer); AIDS Healthcare Foundation Inc. ($20,000 to Legislative Progressive Caucus Center; lobbyist employer); United Nurses Associations of California/Union of Health Care Professionals ($15,000 to Legislative Progressive Caucus Center; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • California Nurses Association paid $100,000 to Legislative Progressive Caucus Center · registered lobbyist employer
  • Olson Remcho, LLP paid $32,058 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Teachers Association paid $25,000 to Legislative Progressive Caucus Center · registered lobbyist employer
  • AIDS Healthcare Foundation Inc. paid $20,000 to Legislative Progressive Caucus Center · registered lobbyist employer
  • United Nurses Associations of California/Union of Health Care Professionals paid $15,000 to Legislative Progressive Caucus Center · registered lobbyist employer
  • National Union of Healthcare Workers paid $10,000 to Legislative Progressive Caucus Center · registered lobbyist employer
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $5,000 to Summerdale Elementary School · gave $6,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Federation of Teachers paid $2,500 to Legislative Progressive Caucus Center · registered lobbyist employer
  • PACE of California School Employees Association Small Contributor Committee (ID#761128) paid $1,500 to Legislative Progressive Caucus Center · gave $5,130 to the campaign
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Anamarie Avila Farias Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $1,215,000 paid at their request since 2024: 7 sources ($102,500) also gave $37,900 to their campaign; 23 sources ($422,500) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Altria Client Services ($55,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation; lobbyist employer); Phillips 66 Company ($41,500 to California Problem Solvers Action Fund, California Problem Solvers Foundation; gave $11,800 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); Western States Petroleum Association ($35,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation, San Diego County and Communities of Interest Legislative Caucus; lobbyist employer); PMI US Corporate Services ($25,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation; lobbyist employer); PBF Holding Company LLC ($25,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Altria Client Services paid $55,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Phillips 66 Company paid $41,500 to California Problem Solvers Action Fund, California Problem Solvers Foundation, Community Youth Center · gave $11,800 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Western States Petroleum Association paid $35,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation, San Diego County and Communities of Interest Legislative Caucus · registered lobbyist employer
  • PMI US Corporate Services paid $25,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • PBF Holding Company LLC paid $25,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Charter Schools Association paid $20,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Apartment Association paid $20,000 to Community Youth Center, San Diego County and Communities of Interest Legislative Caucus · registered lobbyist employer
  • West Coast University paid $20,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Anheuser-Busch Companies paid $20,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · gave $9,100 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Netflix, Inc. paid $20,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Turo Inc paid $15,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Coinbase paid $15,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • and 13 more on the person's page
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Angelique Victoirae Ashby Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $385,450 paid at their request since 2024: 5 sources ($74,450) also gave $29,640 to their campaign; 13 sources ($138,950) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: VSP Vision ($38,450 to Capital Caucus Foundation, Southepointe Christian Center; gave $2,000 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); California Federation of Teachers ($10,000 to Equality California; lobbyist employer); PG&E ($10,000 to Equality California; gave $5,300 to the campaign); Wellspace Health ($10,000 to Capital Caucus Foundation; lobbyist employer); Davita ($10,000 to Capital Caucus Foundation; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • VSP Vision paid $38,450 to Capital Caucus Foundation, Southepointe Christian Center · gave $2,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Federation of Teachers paid $10,000 to Equality California · registered lobbyist employer
  • PG&E paid $10,000 to Equality California · gave $5,300 to the campaign
  • Wellspace Health paid $10,000 to Capital Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Davita paid $10,000 to Capital Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Medical Association paid $10,000 to Capital Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America paid $10,000 to Capital Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Meta Platforms Inc. paid $10,000 to Capital Caucus Foundation · gave $3,800 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Anheuser Busch Companies paid $10,000 to Capital Caucus Foundation · gave $16,040 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • RAI Services Company paid $10,000 to Capital Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Intuit paid $6,000 to Equality California · gave $2,500 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Blue Shield of California paid $6,000 to Equality California · registered lobbyist employer
  • and 2 more on the person's page
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Anna Marie Caballero Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $80,800 paid at their request since 2024: 2 sources ($10,000) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Calpine Corporation ($5,000 to Community Foundation of Merced County; lobbyist employer); Barona Band of Mission Indians ($5,000 to Madera South High School; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Calpine Corporation paid $5,000 to Community Foundation of Merced County · registered lobbyist employer
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $5,000 to Madera South High School · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Ash Kalra Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $246,192 paid at their request since 2024: 3 sources ($86,114) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Olson Remcho, LLP ($71,114 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta; lobbyist employer); META Platforms, Inc. ($10,000 to Sacred Heart Community Service; lobbyist employer); Consumer Attorneys of California ($5,000 to River Cats Foundation, Inc.; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Olson Remcho, LLP paid $71,114 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta · registered lobbyist employer
  • META Platforms, Inc. paid $10,000 to Sacred Heart Community Service · registered lobbyist employer
  • Consumer Attorneys of California paid $5,000 to River Cats Foundation, Inc. · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Avelino Valencia Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $97,305 paid at their request since 2024: 5 sources ($35,037) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: California Chamber of Commerce ($10,000 to The Rivercats Foundation; lobbyist employer); Rancho Santiago Community College District ($7,537 to Friends of Families; lobbyist employer); California Apartment Association ($7,500 to River Cats Foundation, Inc.; lobbyist employer); California Correctional Peace Officers Association ($5,000 to The River Cats Foundation; lobbyist employer); Elevate California ($5,000 to River Cats Foundation, Inc.; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • California Chamber of Commerce paid $10,000 to The Rivercats Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Rancho Santiago Community College District paid $7,537 to Friends of Families · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Apartment Association paid $7,500 to River Cats Foundation, Inc. · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Correctional Peace Officers Association paid $5,000 to The River Cats Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Elevate California paid $5,000 to River Cats Foundation, Inc. · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Blanca N Pacheco Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $129,534 paid at their request since 2024: 4 sources ($29,700) also gave $78,200 to their campaign; 6 sources ($44,700) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: DaVita ($10,000 to Assembly District 64 Turkey Giveaway, Rancho Foundation; gave $20,500 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); Western States Petroleum Association ($10,000 to EQCA Institute C4; lobbyist employer); Turo ($9,800 to Community Family Guidance Center, Downey Police Officers Association; gave $40,900 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); CA Correctional Peace Officers Association ($5,000 to Rancho Foundation; lobbyist employer); Meta Platforms Inc. ($5,000 to Rancho Foundation; gave $5,900 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • DaVita paid $10,000 to Assembly District 64 Turkey Giveaway, Rancho Foundation · gave $20,500 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Western States Petroleum Association paid $10,000 to EQCA Institute C4 · registered lobbyist employer
  • Turo paid $9,800 to Community Family Guidance Center, Downey Police Officers Association · gave $40,900 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • CA Correctional Peace Officers Association paid $5,000 to Rancho Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Meta Platforms Inc. paid $5,000 to Rancho Foundation · gave $5,900 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Walmart Inc paid $4,900 to Friends of the Downey Police K9 Foundation Inc · gave $10,900 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Blanca Rubio Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $588,063 paid at their request since 2024: 8 sources ($97,500) also gave $50,949 to their campaign; 17 sources ($177,772) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: VSP Vision ($37,272 to California Issues Forum, Duarte Senior Center; lobbyist employer); Chevron ($30,000 to California Women Lead, Center for Financial Empowerment; gave $5,900 to the campaign); Barona Band of Mission Indians ($15,000 to Merlinda Elementary School, Valinda School of Academics; lobbyist employer); California Issues Forum ($15,000 to Center for Financial Empowerment; gave $3,449 to the campaign); Valero Services, Inc ($15,000 to Center for Financial Empowerment; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • VSP Vision paid $37,272 to California Issues Forum, Duarte Senior Center · registered lobbyist employer
  • Chevron paid $30,000 to California Women Lead, Center for Financial Empowerment · gave $5,900 to the campaign
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $15,000 to Merlinda Elementary School, Valinda School of Academics · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Issues Forum paid $15,000 to Center for Financial Empowerment · gave $3,449.08 to the campaign
  • Valero Services, Inc paid $15,000 to Center for Financial Empowerment · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Correctional Peace Officers Association paid $15,000 to Center for Financial Empowerment, ST. LOUIS OF FRANCE CATHOLIC CHURCH · registered lobbyist employer
  • Fresenius Medical Care paid $15,000 to Center for Financial Empowerment · gave $10,900 to the campaign
  • Athens Services paid $12,500 to Center for Financial Empowerment · gave $5,900 to the campaign
  • California Charter Schools Association paid $12,500 to Center for Financial Empowerment · registered lobbyist employer
  • DaVita paid $10,000 to Center for Financial Empowerment · registered lobbyist employer
  • CALIFORNIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION paid $10,000 to Center for Financial Empowerment · registered lobbyist employer
  • CALIFORNIA BROADBAND & VIDEO ASSOCIATION paid $10,000 to Center for Financial Empowerment · gave $3,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • and 9 more on the person's page
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Brian W Jones Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $15,000 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($15,000) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Barona Band of Mission Indians ($15,000 to Ramona High School, Tierra del Sol Middle School; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $15,000 to Ramona High School, Tierra del Sol Middle School · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Buffy Wicks Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $3,298,000 paid at their request since 2024: 2 sources ($15,000) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Pacific Gas and Electric Company ($10,000 to GIFFORDS Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence; lobbyist employer); Barona Band of Mission Indians ($5,000 to Peralta Elementary School; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Pacific Gas and Electric Company paid $10,000 to GIFFORDS Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence · registered lobbyist employer
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $5,000 to Peralta Elementary School · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Caroline Yvette Menjivar Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $306,377 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($12,000) also gave $5,000 to their campaign; 6 sources ($60,829) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: California Nurses Association ($25,000 to Somos Familia Valle; lobbyist employer); DaVita ($12,000 to Somos Familia Valle; gave $5,000 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); Sutter Health ($7,500 to River Cats Foundation, Inc.; lobbyist employer); Home Depot Corporation ($6,329 to Sen. Menjivar Veterans' Resource Fair; lobbyist employer); Personal Care Products Council ($5,000 to Kids' Community Dental Clinic; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • California Nurses Association paid $25,000 to Somos Familia Valle · registered lobbyist employer
  • DaVita paid $12,000 to Somos Familia Valle · gave $5,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Sutter Health paid $7,500 to River Cats Foundation, Inc. · registered lobbyist employer
  • Home Depot Corporation paid $6,329 to Sen. Menjivar Veterans' Resource Fair · registered lobbyist employer
  • Personal Care Products Council paid $5,000 to Kids' Community Dental Clinic · registered lobbyist employer
  • Consumer Attorneys of California paid $5,000 to River Cats Foundation, Inc. · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Catherine Stefani Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $255,342 paid at their request since 2024: 2 sources ($101,961) also gave $9,400 to their campaign; 6 sources ($151,961) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Turo Inc. ($56,230 to Italian Caucus of California; gave $7,900 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); United Airlines ($45,731 to Italian Caucus of California; gave $1,500 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); State Building and Construction Trades Council of California ($20,000 to Italian Caucus of California; lobbyist employer); California Life Sciences ($20,000 to Italian Caucus of California; lobbyist employer); Sutter Health ($5,000 to Community Youth Center of San Francisco; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Turo Inc. paid $56,230 to Italian Caucus of California · gave $7,900 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • United Airlines paid $45,731 to Italian Caucus of California · gave $1,500 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • State Building and Construction Trades Council of California paid $20,000 to Italian Caucus of California · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Life Sciences paid $20,000 to Italian Caucus of California · registered lobbyist employer
  • Sutter Health paid $5,000 to Community Youth Center of San Francisco · registered lobbyist employer
  • Natera, Inc. paid $5,000 to Italian Caucus of California · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Cecilia M Aguiar-Curry Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $2,081,869 paid at their request since 2024: 11 sources ($355,000) also gave $50,100 to their campaign; 39 sources ($829,000) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Comcast Financial Agency Corporation ($100,000 to Women in California Leadership; gave $9,300 to the campaign); Sutter Health ($75,000 to Women in California Leadership; lobbyist employer); FanDuel ($65,000 to Women in California Leadership; gave $1,500 to the campaign); Meta Platforms, Inc. ($55,000 to Women in California Leadership; gave $5,900 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); Altria Client Services LLC ($50,000 to Women in California Leadership; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Comcast Financial Agency Corporation paid $100,000 to Women in California Leadership · gave $9,300 to the campaign
  • Sutter Health paid $75,000 to Women in California Leadership · registered lobbyist employer
  • FanDuel paid $65,000 to Women in California Leadership · gave $1,500 to the campaign
  • Meta Platforms, Inc. paid $55,000 to Women in California Leadership · gave $5,900 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Altria Client Services LLC paid $50,000 to Women in California Leadership · registered lobbyist employer
  • CA Teachers Association paid $50,000 to Women in California Leadership · registered lobbyist employer
  • Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC paid $35,000 to Women in California Leadership · registered lobbyist employer
  • Early Care & Education Consortium, Inc. paid $35,000 to Women in California Leadership · registered lobbyist employer
  • Snap, Inc. paid $30,000 to Women in California Leadership · registered lobbyist employer
  • Cigna Holding Company paid $30,000 to Women in California Leadership · gave $2,500 to the campaign
  • California Charter Schools Association paid $30,000 to Women in California Leadership · registered lobbyist employer
  • Prime Therapeutics paid $30,000 to Women in California Leadership · gave $3,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • and 13 more on the person's page
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Celeste T. Rodriguez Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $39,500 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($5,000) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Walmart ($5,000 to North Valley Caring Services; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Walmart paid $5,000 to North Valley Caring Services · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Christopher M Ward Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $450,238 paid at their request since 2024: 3 sources ($40,163) also gave $20,300 to their campaign; 3 sources ($55,000) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Barona Band of Mission Indians ($25,000 to Bay Park Elementary School, Birney Elementary School; gave $9,400 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); Sutter Health ($25,000 to California LGBTQ Foundation; lobbyist employer); Irvine Company ($10,000 to Equality California (EQCA) Institute; gave $5,900 to the campaign); Cox Communications ($5,163 to Equality California Institute C4; gave $5,000 to the campaign); San Diego Community Power ($5,000 to San Diego County & Communities of Interest Legislative Caucus; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $25,000 to Bay Park Elementary School, Birney Elementary School, California LGBTQ Foundation · gave $9,400 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Sutter Health paid $25,000 to California LGBTQ Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Irvine Company paid $10,000 to Equality California (EQCA) Institute · gave $5,900 to the campaign
  • Cox Communications paid $5,163 to Equality California Institute C4 · gave $5,000 to the campaign
  • San Diego Community Power paid $5,000 to San Diego County & Communities of Interest Legislative Caucus · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Corey Alexander Jackson Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $257,272 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($5,000) also gave $1,500 to their campaign; 3 sources ($35,305) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Exxon Mobil ($15,305 to Sigma Beta Xi, Inc.; lobbyist employer); CA New Car Dealers Association ($10,000 to Legislative Progressive Caucus Center; lobbyist employer); Meta Platforms, Inc. ($10,000 to Sigma Beta Xi, Inc.; lobbyist employer); Technology Network (Technet) California PAC ($5,000 to Sigma Beta Xi, Inc.; gave $1,500 to the campaign).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Exxon Mobil paid $15,305 to Sigma Beta Xi, Inc. · registered lobbyist employer
  • CA New Car Dealers Association paid $10,000 to Legislative Progressive Caucus Center · registered lobbyist employer
  • Meta Platforms, Inc. paid $10,000 to Sigma Beta Xi, Inc. · registered lobbyist employer
  • Technology Network (Technet) California PAC paid $5,000 to Sigma Beta Xi, Inc. · gave $1,500 to the campaign
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Darshana R Patel Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $51,000 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($5,000) also gave $11,800 to their campaign; 1 source ($5,000) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Barona Band of Mission Indians ($5,000 to Dimensions Collaborative School; gave $11,800 to the campaign; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $5,000 to Dimensions Collaborative School · gave $11,800 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

David A Alvarez Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $1,076,500 paid at their request since 2024: 7 sources ($123,000) also gave $44,400 to their campaign; 19 sources ($360,500) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Altria Client Services ($60,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation, The Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank; lobbyist employer); PBF Holding Company LLC ($25,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation; gave $5,900 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); PMI US Corporate Services ($25,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation; lobbyist employer); Western States Petroleum Association ($25,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation; lobbyist employer); Phillips 66 Company ($20,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation; gave $11,800 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Altria Client Services paid $60,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation, The Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank · registered lobbyist employer
  • PBF Holding Company LLC paid $25,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · gave $5,900 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • PMI US Corporate Services paid $25,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Western States Petroleum Association paid $25,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Phillips 66 Company paid $20,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · gave $11,800 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Charter Schools Association paid $20,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • 1PointFive US LLC paid $20,000 to California Problem Solvers Action Fund · gave $5,900 to the campaign
  • West Coast University paid $20,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Dairies, Inc. paid $20,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · gave $3,500 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Anheuser-Busch Companies paid $20,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · gave $8,400 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • The Doctors Management Company paid $15,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Coinbase paid $15,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • and 9 more on the person's page
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

David D Cortese Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $226,900 paid at their request since 2024: 3 sources ($102,383) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Turo Inc. ($56,230 to Italian Caucus of California; lobbyist employer); United Airlines ($26,153 to Italian Caucus of California; lobbyist employer); State Building and Construction Trades Council of California ($20,000 to Italian Caucus of California; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Turo Inc. paid $56,230 to Italian Caucus of California · registered lobbyist employer
  • United Airlines paid $26,153 to Italian Caucus of California · registered lobbyist employer
  • State Building and Construction Trades Council of California paid $20,000 to Italian Caucus of California · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

David J Tangipa Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $15,000 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($10,000) also gave $3,000 to their campaign; 1 source ($5,000) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and Its Affiliates ($10,000 to California Armenian Legislative Caucus Foundation; gave $3,000 to the campaign); META Platforms, Inc. ($5,000 to Catholic Charities of Diocese of Fresno; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and Its Affiliates paid $10,000 to California Armenian Legislative Caucus Foundation · gave $3,000 to the campaign
  • META Platforms, Inc. paid $5,000 to Catholic Charities of Diocese of Fresno · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Dawn J. Addis Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $684,500 paid at their request since 2024: 3 sources ($60,000) also gave $18,300 to their campaign; 10 sources ($210,000) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Amarok ($40,000 to California Legislative Central Coast Caucus Foundation; lobbyist employer); Vineyard Offshore ($35,000 to California Legislative Central Coast Caucus Foundation; lobbyist employer); Amarok Ultimate Perimeter Security ($30,000 to California Legislative Central Coast Caucus Foundation; gave $1,500 to the campaign); Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians ($30,000 to California Legislative Central Coast Caucus Foundation; lobbyist employer); Santa Ynez Band of Mission Indians ($15,000 to California Legislative Central Coast Caucus Foundation; gave $5,000 to the campaign); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Amarok paid $40,000 to California Legislative Central Coast Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Vineyard Offshore paid $35,000 to California Legislative Central Coast Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Amarok Ultimate Perimeter Security paid $30,000 to California Legislative Central Coast Caucus Foundation · gave $1,500 to the campaign
  • Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians paid $30,000 to California Legislative Central Coast Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Santa Ynez Band of Mission Indians paid $15,000 to California Legislative Central Coast Caucus Foundation · gave $5,000 to the campaign
  • California Credit Union League paid $15,000 to California Legislative Central Coast Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Invenergy, LLC paid $15,000 to California Legislative Central Coast Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Charter Schools Association paid $15,000 to California Legislative Central Coast Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Meta Platforms paid $15,000 to California Legislative Central Coast Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Golden State Wind paid $15,000 to California Legislative Central Coast Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Dental Association PAC (CDA PAC) paid $15,000 to California Legislative Central Coast Caucus Foundation · gave $11,800 to the campaign
  • BlackRock paid $15,000 to California Legislative Central Coast Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • and 1 more on the person's page
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Diane Papan Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $46,055 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($15,000) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS ($15,000 to ALLEN PRESCHOOL, Hoover Community School; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS paid $15,000 to ALLEN PRESCHOOL, Hoover Community School, Ravenswood Education Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Elizabeth Ortega Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $390,230 paid at their request since 2024: 4 sources ($154,730) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Olson Remcho, LLP ($71,114 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta; lobbyist employer); VSP Vision ($43,616 to Conley-Caraballo High School; lobbyist employer); California Nurse's Association ($20,000 to 4C's of Alameda County, Community Child Care Coordinating Council of Alameda County; lobbyist employer); Sutter Health ($20,000 to 4C's of Alameda County, Community Child Care Coordinating Council of Alameda County; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Olson Remcho, LLP paid $71,114 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta · registered lobbyist employer
  • VSP Vision paid $43,616 to Conley-Caraballo High School · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Nurse's Association paid $20,000 to 4C's of Alameda County, Community Child Care Coordinating Council of Alameda County · registered lobbyist employer
  • Sutter Health paid $20,000 to 4C's of Alameda County, Community Child Care Coordinating Council of Alameda County · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Eloise G Reyes Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $177,716 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($9,500) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: San Bernardino City Unified School District ($9,500 to INLAND EMPIRE COMMUNITY COLLABORATIVE INC; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • San Bernardino City Unified School District paid $9,500 to INLAND EMPIRE COMMUNITY COLLABORATIVE INC · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Esmeralda Z Soria Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $491,967 paid at their request since 2024: 10 sources ($168,233) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Pacific Gas and Electric Company ($75,000 to Fresno Area Hispanic Foundation, United Way of Merced County; lobbyist employer); California Correctional Peace Officer's Association ($20,000 to Asian Resources Inc., United Way of Merced County; lobbyist employer); Walmart Inc. ($20,000 to United Way of Merced County; lobbyist employer); Sysco ($14,233 to United Way of Merced County; lobbyist employer); California Apartment Association ($10,000 to United Way of Merced County; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Pacific Gas and Electric Company paid $75,000 to Fresno Area Hispanic Foundation, United Way of Merced County · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Correctional Peace Officer's Association paid $20,000 to Asian Resources Inc., United Way of Merced County, Valley Onward · registered lobbyist employer
  • Walmart Inc. paid $20,000 to United Way of Merced County · registered lobbyist employer
  • Sysco paid $14,233 to United Way of Merced County · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Apartment Association paid $10,000 to United Way of Merced County · registered lobbyist employer
  • DaVita paid $9,000 to Asian Resources, Inc., United Way of Merced County · registered lobbyist employer
  • Personal Care Products Council paid $5,000 to United Way of Merced County · registered lobbyist employer
  • Caylym Technologies International paid $5,000 to United Way of Merced County · registered lobbyist employer
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $5,000 to Cantua Elementary School · registered lobbyist employer
  • Visa Inc. paid $5,000 to United Way of Merced County · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Gavin Newsom Governor

Context Behested payments

Of $43,048,974 paid at their request since 2024: 24 sources ($4,956,600) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria ($1,500,000 to California Partner's Project (Jennifer Siebel Newsom, Founding Member for payee, spouse of Governor Newsom, California Partners Project (Jennifer Siebel Newsom, Founding Member for payee, spouse of Governor Newsom); lobbyist employer); Autodesk ($500,000 to Edward Charles Foundation DBA LA Rises; lobbyist employer); Lockheed Martin ($500,000 to California Fire Foundation; lobbyist employer); BlackRock ($500,000 to California Fire Foundation; lobbyist employer); PayPal ($250,000 to California Fire Foundation; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria paid $1,500,000 to California Partner's Project (Jennifer Siebel Newsom, Founding Member for payee, spouse of Governor Newsom, California Partners Project (Jennifer Siebel Newsom, Founding Member for payee, spouse of Governor Newsom), California Partners Project (Jennifer Siebel Newsom, Founding Member for payee, spouse of Governor Newsom) · registered lobbyist employer
  • Autodesk paid $500,000 to Edward Charles Foundation DBA LA Rises · registered lobbyist employer
  • Lockheed Martin paid $500,000 to California Fire Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • BlackRock paid $500,000 to California Fire Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • PayPal paid $250,000 to California Fire Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Apple paid $250,000 to California Fire Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Estee Lauder paid $225,000 to California Fire Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Target paid $200,000 to California Fire Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Zoox paid $155,000 to California Protocol Foundation, California State Protocol Foundation, Protocol Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • American Express paid $150,000 to California Fire Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • U.S Energy Foundation paid $150,000 to California State Protocol Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Resources Legacy Fund paid $100,000 to California State Protocol Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • and 12 more on the person's page
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Gregg A Hart Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $239,000 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($15,000) also gave $1,000 to their campaign; 4 sources ($60,000) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Invenergy, LLC ($15,000 to California Legislative Central Coast Caucus Foundation; gave $1,000 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); Vineyard Offshore ($15,000 to California Legislative Central Coast Caucus Foundation; lobbyist employer); Pacific Gas and Electric Company ($15,000 to California Legislative Central Coast Caucus Foundation; lobbyist employer); Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. ($15,000 to California Legislative Central Coast Caucus Foundation; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Invenergy, LLC paid $15,000 to California Legislative Central Coast Caucus Foundation · gave $1,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Vineyard Offshore paid $15,000 to California Legislative Central Coast Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Pacific Gas and Electric Company paid $15,000 to California Legislative Central Coast Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. paid $15,000 to California Legislative Central Coast Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Heath Flora Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $891,334 paid at their request since 2024: 6 sources ($53,834) also gave $33,800 to their campaign; 18 sources ($292,334) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: California Charter Schools Association ($30,000 to California Problem Solvers Caucus Action Fund, California Problem Solvers Foundation; lobbyist employer); PMI US Corporate Services ($25,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation; lobbyist employer); Altria Client Services ($25,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation; lobbyist employer); Western States Petroleum Association ($25,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation; lobbyist employer); PBF Holding Company LLC ($25,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • California Charter Schools Association paid $30,000 to California Problem Solvers Caucus Action Fund, California Problem Solvers Foundation, Problem Solvers Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • PMI US Corporate Services paid $25,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Altria Client Services paid $25,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Western States Petroleum Association paid $25,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • PBF Holding Company LLC paid $25,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Chamber of Commerce paid $20,000 to California Problem Solvers Action Fund · registered lobbyist employer
  • Phillips 66 Company paid $20,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation, Problem Solvers Caucus Foundation · gave $5,900 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Turo Inc paid $15,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Molina Healthcare Inc. paid $15,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · gave $4,000 to the campaign
  • ONE CALL paid $15,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Coinbase paid $15,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • American Career College paid $15,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • and 9 more on the person's page
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Isaac Gregory Bryan Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $193,114 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($5,000) also gave $5,500 to their campaign; 4 sources ($85,614) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Olson Remcho, LLP ($71,114 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta; lobbyist employer); FOX Corporation ($5,000 to Social Justice Learning Institute, Inc.; gave $5,500 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); Netflix Inc. ($5,000 to Social Justice Learning Institute; lobbyist employer); AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC ($4,500 to Social Justice Learning Institute; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Olson Remcho, LLP paid $71,114 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta · registered lobbyist employer
  • FOX Corporation paid $5,000 to Social Justice Learning Institute, Inc. · gave $5,500 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Netflix Inc. paid $5,000 to Social Justice Learning Institute · registered lobbyist employer
  • AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC paid $4,500 to Social Justice Learning Institute · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

James C Ramos Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $551,000 paid at their request since 2024: 12 sources ($253,000) also gave $174,100 to their campaign; 8 sources ($165,500) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Morongo Band of Mission Indians ($80,000 to California Heritage Indian Collaborative Organization; gave $5,900 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); Altria Client Services LLC ($30,000 to California Heritage Indian Collaborative Organization; lobbyist employer); Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation ($30,000 to California Heritage Indian Collaborative Organization; gave $75,800 to the campaign); James C. Ramos Jr. ($25,000 to California Heritage Indian Collaborative Organization; gave $11,800 to the campaign); San Manuel Band of Mission Indians ($25,000 to California Heritage Indian Collaborative Organization; gave $11,000 to the campaign); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Morongo Band of Mission Indians paid $80,000 to California Heritage Indian Collaborative Organization · gave $5,900 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Altria Client Services LLC paid $30,000 to California Heritage Indian Collaborative Organization · registered lobbyist employer
  • Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation paid $30,000 to California Heritage Indian Collaborative Organization · gave $75,800 to the campaign
  • James C. Ramos Jr. paid $25,000 to California Heritage Indian Collaborative Organization · gave $11,800 to the campaign
  • San Manuel Band of Mission Indians paid $25,000 to California Heritage Indian Collaborative Organization · gave $11,000 to the campaign
  • Katrina Rose Ramos paid $25,000 to California Heritage Indian Collaborative Organization · gave $5,900 to the campaign
  • Santa Ynez Band of Mission Indians paid $15,000 to California Heritage Indian Collaborative Organization · gave $11,400 to the campaign
  • Swedish Match North America LLC paid $15,000 to California Heritage Indian Collaborative Organization · registered lobbyist employer
  • First American Development Inc. paid $12,500 to California Heritage Indian Collaborative Organization · gave $8,400 to the campaign
  • Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians paid $10,000 to California Heritage Indian Collaborative Organization, California Heritage Indian Collaborative Orgnaization · gave $6,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Table Mountain Rancheria paid $10,000 to California Heritage Indian Collaborative Organization · gave $11,800 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $8,000 to California Heritage Indian Collaborative Organization, Eisenhower High School · gave $5,900 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • and 3 more on the person's page
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Jesse Samuel Gabriel Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $1,296,298 paid at their request since 2024: 13 sources ($105,300) also gave $106,500 to their campaign; 9 sources ($115,000) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Los Angeles Rams ($30,000 to Hope the Mission; lobbyist employer); Vanguard Charitable ($25,000 to Hillel at UCLA; lobbyist employer); CVS Health ($15,000 to Child Development Institute; gave $5,900 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); Mark Weinstein ($10,400 to Hillel at UCLA; gave $5,900 to the campaign); Brian Goldsmith ($10,200 to Hillel at UCLA; gave $1,000 to the campaign); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Los Angeles Rams paid $30,000 to Hope the Mission · registered lobbyist employer
  • Vanguard Charitable paid $25,000 to Hillel at UCLA · registered lobbyist employer
  • CVS Health paid $15,000 to Child Development Institute · gave $5,900 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Mark Weinstein paid $10,400 to Hillel at UCLA · gave $5,900 to the campaign
  • Brian Goldsmith paid $10,200 to Hillel at UCLA · gave $1,000 to the campaign
  • Uber Technologies, Inc paid $10,000 to LA Family Housing · gave $5,900 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Pechanga Band of Indians paid $10,000 to California Jewish Legislative Caucus Leadership Foundation · gave $14,800 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Daniel Gryczman paid $10,000 to Hillel at UCLA · gave $15,700 to the campaign
  • Morongo Band of Mission Indians paid $10,000 to Hope the Mission · gave $11,800 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Keenan Wolens paid $9,500 to Hillel at UCLA · gave $9,800 to the campaign
  • Workday, Inc. paid $5,000 to California Jewish Legislative Caucus Leadership Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • The Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $5,000 to LA Family Housing · gave $4,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • and 5 more on the person's page
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Jessica Caloza Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $143,848 paid at their request since 2024: 3 sources ($66,848) also gave $14,400 to their campaign; 5 sources ($86,848) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Alaska Airlines ($35,000 to Asian Business Association Foundation; gave $2,500 to the campaign); Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. ($35,000 to Asian Business Association Foundation; lobbyist employer); Niagara Bottling, LLC ($26,848 to Alma Family Services, Dream Center; gave $2,000 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); California Rice Industry Association ($15,000 to Asian Business Association Foundation; lobbyist employer); Los Angeles Dodgers ($5,000 to Alma Family Services, Eastmont Community Center; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Alaska Airlines paid $35,000 to Asian Business Association Foundation · gave $2,500 to the campaign
  • Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. paid $35,000 to Asian Business Association Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Niagara Bottling, LLC paid $26,848 to Alma Family Services, Dream Center · gave $2,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Rice Industry Association paid $15,000 to Asian Business Association Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Los Angeles Dodgers paid $5,000 to Alma Family Services, Eastmont Community Center · registered lobbyist employer
  • AirBNB paid $5,000 to Alma Family Services · gave $9,900 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

John Christopher Harabedian Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $49,480 paid at their request since 2024: 2 sources ($13,450) also gave $3,000 to their campaign; 3 sources ($18,450) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Niagara Bottling, LLC ($8,450 to East West Bank Foundation; gave $1,000 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); California Dairies, Inc. ($5,000 to Asian Business Association Foundation; gave $2,000 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); American Pistachio Growers ($5,000 to Asian Business Association Foundation; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Niagara Bottling, LLC paid $8,450 to East West Bank Foundation · gave $1,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Dairies, Inc. paid $5,000 to Asian Business Association Foundation · gave $2,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • American Pistachio Growers paid $5,000 to Asian Business Association Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Jose L Solache Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $40,000 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($5,000) also gave $7,000 to their campaign; 1 source ($5,000) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Barona Band of Mission Indians ($5,000 to Lynwood High School; gave $7,000 to the campaign; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $5,000 to Lynwood High School · gave $7,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Joshua R Hoover Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $48,332 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($1,334) also gave $8,000 to their campaign; 2 sources ($3,334) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: NEUROCRINE BIOSCIENCES, INC ($2,000 to Capital Caucus Foundation; lobbyist employer); VSP Vision ($1,334 to Capital Caucus Foundation; gave $8,000 to the campaign; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • NEUROCRINE BIOSCIENCES, INC paid $2,000 to Capital Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • VSP Vision paid $1,334 to Capital Caucus Foundation · gave $8,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Juan Alberto Alanis Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $537,000 paid at their request since 2024: 3 sources ($45,000) also gave $21,500 to their campaign; 10 sources ($167,000) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Altria Client Services LLC and its affiliates ($30,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation; lobbyist employer); Phillips 66 Company ($20,000 to California Problem Solvers Action Fund, California Problem Solvers Foundation; gave $4,500 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); West Coast University ($20,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation; lobbyist employer); California Dairies, Inc. ($20,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation; lobbyist employer); Anheuser-Busch Companies ($20,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation; gave $6,000 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Altria Client Services LLC and its affiliates paid $30,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Phillips 66 Company paid $20,000 to California Problem Solvers Action Fund, California Problem Solvers Foundation · gave $4,500 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • West Coast University paid $20,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Dairies, Inc. paid $20,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Anheuser-Busch Companies paid $20,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · gave $6,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Netflix Inc. paid $20,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • United Healthcare Services, Inc. paid $12,000 to California Problem Solvers Action Fund · registered lobbyist employer
  • Abbvie Inc. paid $10,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Chamber of Commerce paid $10,000 to California Problem Solvers Action Fund · registered lobbyist employer
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $5,000 to Beyer High School · gave $11,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Juan Carrillo Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $528,000 paid at their request since 2024: 3 sources ($65,000) also gave $21,400 to their campaign; 3 sources ($45,000) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: PG&E ($35,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation; gave $7,400 to the campaign); Pacific Gas & Electric Company ($25,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation; lobbyist employer); PepsiCo Inc. ($15,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation; gave $4,000 to the campaign); FanDuel Inc ($15,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation; gave $10,000 to the campaign); The Coca-Cola Co. ($10,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • PG&E paid $35,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation · gave $7,400 to the campaign
  • Pacific Gas & Electric Company paid $25,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • PepsiCo Inc. paid $15,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation · gave $4,000 to the campaign
  • FanDuel Inc paid $15,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation · gave $10,000 to the campaign
  • The Coca-Cola Co. paid $10,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Western States Petroleum Association paid $10,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Kate Sanchez Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $119,610 paid at their request since 2024: 2 sources ($10,000) also gave $8,900 to their campaign; 2 sources ($10,000) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Barona Band of Mission Indians ($5,000 to Cole Canyon Elementary School; gave $3,000 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); Meta Platforms, Inc. ($5,000 to RSM CARES | Bell Tower Foundation; gave $5,900 to the campaign; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $5,000 to Cole Canyon Elementary School · gave $3,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Meta Platforms, Inc. paid $5,000 to RSM CARES | Bell Tower Foundation · gave $5,900 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

LaShae Nicole Sharp-Collins Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $83,251 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($5,000) also gave $5,000 to their campaign; 2 sources ($10,000) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Sycuan Band of Kumeyaay Nation ($5,000 to Mandate Project Impact, Inc; gave $5,000 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America ($5,000 to The Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Sycuan Band of Kumeyaay Nation paid $5,000 to Mandate Project Impact, Inc · gave $5,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America paid $5,000 to The Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Laura Richardson Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $21,000 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($5,000) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Phillips 66 ($5,000 to NEW LYFE FOUNDATION; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Phillips 66 paid $5,000 to NEW LYFE FOUNDATION · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Laurie A Davies Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $49,541 paid at their request since 2024: 2 sources ($7,500) also gave $12,000 to their campaign; 2 sources ($7,500) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Barona Band of Mission Indians ($5,000 to Coastal Academy High School; gave $7,000 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); Walmart, Inc. ($2,500 to Jacobs and Cushman San Diego Food Bank; gave $5,000 to the campaign; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $5,000 to Coastal Academy High School · gave $7,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Walmart, Inc. paid $2,500 to Jacobs and Cushman San Diego Food Bank · gave $5,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Lena A Gonzalez Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $2,863,302 paid at their request since 2024: 34 sources ($1,002,500) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: DoorDash, Inc ($162,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation, Equality California; lobbyist employer); Sutter Health ($120,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation; lobbyist employer); Meta Platforms ($65,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation; lobbyist employer); Oportun, Inc ($65,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation; lobbyist employer); California Correctional Peace Officers Association ($50,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • DoorDash, Inc paid $162,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation, Equality California · registered lobbyist employer
  • Sutter Health paid $120,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Meta Platforms paid $65,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Oportun, Inc paid $65,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Correctional Peace Officers Association paid $50,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • VISA paid $45,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Amarok paid $35,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Microsoft paid $35,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians paid $35,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Partnership for Health paid $30,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • BNSF Railway Company paid $30,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Lyft, Inc paid $30,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • and 13 more on the person's page
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Leticia Castillo Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $11,000 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($5,000) also gave $11,800 to their campaign

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Global Processing Systems, Inc ($5,000 to Jurupa Valley Little League; gave $11,800 to the campaign).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Global Processing Systems, Inc paid $5,000 to Jurupa Valley Little League · gave $11,800 to the campaign
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Lola D Smallwood-Cuevas Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $77,558 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($32,058) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Olson Remcho, LLP ($32,058 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Olson Remcho, LLP paid $32,058 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Lori D Wilson Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $2,519,508 paid at their request since 2024: 5 sources ($95,000) also gave $30,200 to their campaign; 36 sources ($1,129,046) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Olson Remcho, LLP ($71,114 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta; lobbyist employer); Novo Nordisk Inc. ($70,000 to California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute; lobbyist employer); HP Inc. ($67,932 to California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute; lobbyist employer); DaVita ($65,000 to California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute; lobbyist employer); California Broadband & Video Association ($60,000 to California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Olson Remcho, LLP paid $71,114 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta · registered lobbyist employer
  • Novo Nordisk Inc. paid $70,000 to California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute · registered lobbyist employer
  • HP Inc. paid $67,932 to California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute · registered lobbyist employer
  • DaVita paid $65,000 to California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Broadband & Video Association paid $60,000 to California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute · registered lobbyist employer
  • Securus Technologies, LLC. paid $55,000 to California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Commerce Club, Inc. paid $55,000 to California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute · registered lobbyist employer
  • State Building and Construction Trades Council of California paid $50,000 to California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute · registered lobbyist employer
  • Altria Client Services Inc. paid $50,000 to California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Teachers Association paid $50,000 to California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute · registered lobbyist employer
  • Microsoft paid $40,000 to California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute · registered lobbyist employer
  • Visa paid $35,000 to California Legislative Black Caucus Policy Institute · registered lobbyist employer
  • and 13 more on the person's page
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Maggy Krell Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $227,900 paid at their request since 2024: 6 sources ($44,400) also gave $40,300 to their campaign; 6 sources ($62,000) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: California Correctional Peace Officers Association ($30,000 to Boys and Girls Club, Capital Caucus Foundation; lobbyist employer); Singleton Schreiber LLP ($17,400 to Legal Services in Krell v. EOIR (2:26-cv-00395); gave $2,500 to the campaign); Anheuser Busch Companies ($10,000 to The Capital Caucus Foundation; gave $17,800 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); RAI Services Company ($10,000 to The Capital Caucus Foundation; lobbyist employer); Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians ($5,000 to Diamond Collective; gave $10,000 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • California Correctional Peace Officers Association paid $30,000 to Boys and Girls Club, Capital Caucus Foundation, Gifts to Share, Inc · registered lobbyist employer
  • Singleton Schreiber LLP paid $17,400 to Legal Services in Krell v. EOIR (2:26-cv-00395) · gave $2,500 to the campaign
  • Anheuser Busch Companies paid $10,000 to The Capital Caucus Foundation · gave $17,800 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • RAI Services Company paid $10,000 to The Capital Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians paid $5,000 to Diamond Collective · gave $10,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Rice Industry Association PAC paid $5,000 to Capital Caucus Foundation · gave $5,000 to the campaign
  • Pacific Gas & Electric Company paid $5,000 to Diamond Collective · registered lobbyist employer
  • Genentech USA paid $5,000 to Capital Caucus Foundation · gave $4,000 to the campaign
  • NEUROCRINE BIOSCIENCES, INC. paid $2,000 to The Capital Caucus Foundation · gave $1,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Marc Berman Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $48,595 paid at their request since 2024: 2 sources ($25,000) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Silicon Valley Community Foundation ($15,000 to Community Services Agency; lobbyist employer); Waymo ($10,000 to Asian Pacific Islander Legislative Caucus Foundation; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Silicon Valley Community Foundation paid $15,000 to Community Services Agency · registered lobbyist employer
  • Waymo paid $10,000 to Asian Pacific Islander Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Maria Elena Durazo Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $132,114 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($71,114) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Olson Remcho, LLP ($71,114 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Olson Remcho, LLP paid $71,114 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Mark Gonzalez Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $596,187 paid at their request since 2024: 11 sources ($77,500) also gave $70,280 to their campaign; 9 sources ($50,000) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Niagara Bottling, LLC ($25,000 to Little Tokyo Service Center; lobbyist employer); Anschutz Entertainment Group ($25,000 to Little Tokyo Service Center; gave $5,500 to the campaign); Athens Services ($20,000 to Equality California, Little Tokyo Service Center; gave $2,000 to the campaign); Reyes Coca Cola Bottling ($7,500 to Little Tokyo Service Center; gave $2,500 to the campaign); Barona Band of Mission Indians ($5,000 to Murchison Street Elementary School; gave $7,000 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Niagara Bottling, LLC paid $25,000 to Little Tokyo Service Center · registered lobbyist employer
  • Anschutz Entertainment Group paid $25,000 to Little Tokyo Service Center · gave $5,500 to the campaign
  • Athens Services paid $20,000 to Equality California, Little Tokyo Service Center · gave $2,000 to the campaign
  • Reyes Coca Cola Bottling paid $7,500 to Little Tokyo Service Center · gave $2,500 to the campaign
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $5,000 to Murchison Street Elementary School · gave $7,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Airbnb paid $5,000 to Little Tokyo Service Center · gave $11,800 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Pechanga Band of Indians paid $5,000 to Equality California · gave $11,800 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Morongo Band of Mission Indians paid $5,000 to Little Tokyo Service Center · gave $11,800 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • SA Recycling LLC paid $5,000 to Little Tokyo Service Center · gave $8,880 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Molina Healthcare paid $0 to Equality California · gave $1,000 to the campaign
  • Serve Robotics Inc. paid $0 to Equality California · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Real Estate Political Action Committee (CREPAC) paid $0 to Equality California · gave $6,000 to the campaign
  • and 2 more on the person's page
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Matthew Haney Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $501,216 paid at their request since 2024: 4 sources ($50,000) also gave $25,600 to their campaign; 13 sources ($246,114) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Olson Remcho, LLP ($71,114 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta; lobbyist employer); Amazon.com Services LLC ($25,000 to Center for New Music San Francisco Inc; lobbyist employer); CA Apartment Association ($25,000 to Center for New Music San Francisco Inc; lobbyist employer); OpenAI OpCo, LLC ($25,000 to Code Tenderloin; lobbyist employer); Uber Technologies Inc. ($20,000 to Center for New Music San Francisco Inc; gave $5,900 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Olson Remcho, LLP paid $71,114 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta · registered lobbyist employer
  • Amazon.com Services LLC paid $25,000 to Center for New Music San Francisco Inc · registered lobbyist employer
  • CA Apartment Association paid $25,000 to Center for New Music San Francisco Inc · registered lobbyist employer
  • OpenAI OpCo, LLC paid $25,000 to Code Tenderloin · registered lobbyist employer
  • Uber Technologies Inc. paid $20,000 to Center for New Music San Francisco Inc · gave $5,900 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Salesforce Inc paid $20,000 to Center for New Music San Francisco Inc, Code Tenderloin · registered lobbyist employer
  • Turo Inc paid $15,000 to Center for New Music San Francisco, Center for New Music San Francisco Inc, Code Tenderloin · gave $2,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Brightstar Global Solutions Corporation paid $10,000 to Center for New Music San Francisco Inc · registered lobbyist employer
  • Airbnb Inc. paid $10,000 to Center for New Music San Francisco Inc, Code Tenderloin · gave $11,800 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Sutter Health paid $10,000 to Center for New Music San Francisco Inc, Code Tenderloin · registered lobbyist employer
  • Pacific Gas and Electric paid $5,000 to Center for New Music San Francisco Inc · registered lobbyist employer
  • Meta Platforms, Inc. paid $5,000 to Center for New Music San Francisco Inc · gave $5,900 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • and 1 more on the person's page
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Melissa Hurtado Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $52,532 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($7,477) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Niagara Bottling, LLC ($7,477 to SD 16 Clean Drinking Water Project; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Niagara Bottling, LLC paid $7,477 to SD 16 Clean Drinking Water Project · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Mialisa Tania Bonta Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $128,736 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($22,736) also gave $2,000 to their campaign; 1 source ($22,736) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: VSP Vision ($22,736 to Native American Health Center; gave $2,000 to the campaign; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • VSP Vision paid $22,736 to Native American Health Center · gave $2,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Michelle Rodriguez Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $117,000 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($10,000) also gave $5,900 to their campaign; 2 sources ($15,000) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Chevron ($10,000 to Just Us 4 Youth; gave $5,900 to the campaign); Chevron U.S.A. Inc. ($10,000 to Just Us 4 Youth; lobbyist employer); Western States Petroleum Association ($5,000 to Just Us 4 Youth; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Chevron paid $10,000 to Just Us 4 Youth · gave $5,900 to the campaign
  • Chevron U.S.A. Inc. paid $10,000 to Just Us 4 Youth · registered lobbyist employer
  • Western States Petroleum Association paid $5,000 to Just Us 4 Youth · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Mike A Gipson Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $160,900 paid at their request since 2024: 4 sources ($35,360) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Phillips 66 ($20,360 to Challenging Minds, Long Beach Public Library Foundation; lobbyist employer); Children's Institute ($5,000 to Challenging Minds; lobbyist employer); City of Long Beach ($5,000 to Challenging Minds; lobbyist employer); California Alliance of Family Owned Businesses ($5,000 to Challenging Minds; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Phillips 66 paid $20,360 to Challenging Minds, Long Beach Public Library Foundation, Murdock Community and Care Services, Inc · registered lobbyist employer
  • Children's Institute paid $5,000 to Challenging Minds · registered lobbyist employer
  • City of Long Beach paid $5,000 to Challenging Minds · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Alliance of Family Owned Businesses paid $5,000 to Challenging Minds · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Mike Fong Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $300,000 paid at their request since 2024: 6 sources ($115,000) also gave $33,100 to their campaign; 8 sources ($122,500) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Meta Platforms, Inc. ($30,000 to Asian Pacific Islander Legislative Caucus Foundation, Asian Youth Center; gave $5,900 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); Amazon.Com Services LLC ($25,000 to Asian Pacific Legislative Caucus Foundation; gave $3,000 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation ($20,000 to Asian Pacific Islander Legislative Caucus Foundation; gave $11,800 to the campaign); Barona Band of Mission Indians ($15,000 to Garvey Intermediate School, Longden Elementary School; gave $3,500 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); CVS Health ($15,000 to Asian Pacific Islander Legislative Caucus Foundation; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Meta Platforms, Inc. paid $30,000 to Asian Pacific Islander Legislative Caucus Foundation, Asian Youth Center · gave $5,900 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Amazon.Com Services LLC paid $25,000 to Asian Pacific Legislative Caucus Foundation · gave $3,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation paid $20,000 to Asian Pacific Islander Legislative Caucus Foundation · gave $11,800 to the campaign
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $15,000 to Garvey Intermediate School, Longden Elementary School, San Gabriel High School · gave $3,500 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • CVS Health paid $15,000 to Asian Pacific Islander Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • CA Correctional Peace Officers Assn paid $15,000 to Asian Pacific Islander Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Ca Dental Association PAC paid $15,000 to Asian Pacific Islander Legislative Caucus Foundation · gave $7,400 to the campaign
  • Centene Management paid $10,000 to Asian Pacific Islander Legislative Caucus Foundation · gave $1,500 to the campaign
  • Pacific Gas & Electric Company paid $10,000 to Asian Pacific Islander Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Coca Cola paid $7,500 to Asian Pacific Islander Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • CA Broadband & Video Association paid $5,000 to Asian Pacific Islander Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Rhodesia R Ransom Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $36,000 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($15,000) also gave $5,900 to their campaign; 1 source ($15,000) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Meta Platforms, Inc. ($15,000 to Brighter Christmas of Tracy, Child Abuse Prevention Council of San Joaquin County; gave $5,900 to the campaign; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Meta Platforms, Inc. paid $15,000 to Brighter Christmas of Tracy, Child Abuse Prevention Council of San Joaquin County, Community Partnership for Families · gave $5,900 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Ricardo Lara Insurance Commissioner

Context Behested payments

Of $428,955 paid at their request since 2024: 4 sources ($37,500) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Barona Band of Mission Indians ($10,000 to Ceres, Eastman Elementary School; lobbyist employer); California Building Industry Association ($10,000 to Ceres; lobbyist employer); California Community Foundation ($10,000 to Ceres Inc.; lobbyist employer); City of Long Beach ($7,500 to Newstart Housing Corporation; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $10,000 to Ceres, Eastman Elementary School · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Building Industry Association paid $10,000 to Ceres · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Community Foundation paid $10,000 to Ceres Inc. · registered lobbyist employer
  • City of Long Beach paid $7,500 to Newstart Housing Corporation · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Rick Chavez Zbur Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $181,500 paid at their request since 2024: 2 sources ($15,000) also gave $15,300 to their campaign; 2 sources ($15,000) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Barona Band of Mission Indians ($10,000 to Hollywood High School; gave $3,500 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); Pechanga Band of Indians ($5,000 to Equality California; gave $11,800 to the campaign; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $10,000 to Hollywood High School · gave $3,500 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Pechanga Band of Indians paid $5,000 to Equality California · gave $11,800 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Robert A. Rivas Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $638,923 paid at their request since 2024: 4 sources ($161,848) also gave $21,300 to their campaign; 7 sources ($242,173) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: VSP Vision ($131,848 to AD 29 Eyecare Clinics, Meta Platforms Inc.; gave $5,000 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); AltaMed Health Services Corp ($50,000 to Cesar Chavez Foundation; lobbyist employer); Sunrun ($15,000 to The Climate Center; gave $2,500 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); United Farm Workers ($15,000 to Cesar Chavez Foundation; lobbyist employer); Cruise ($10,325 to Equality California C4; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • VSP Vision paid $131,848 to AD 29 Eyecare Clinics, Meta Platforms Inc. · gave $5,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • AltaMed Health Services Corp paid $50,000 to Cesar Chavez Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Sunrun paid $15,000 to The Climate Center · gave $2,500 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • United Farm Workers paid $15,000 to Cesar Chavez Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Cruise paid $10,325 to Equality California C4 · registered lobbyist employer
  • Resources Legacy Fund paid $10,000 to California Environmental Voters Education Fund · registered lobbyist employer
  • Airbnb paid $10,000 to Cesar Chavez Foundation · gave $11,800 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company paid $5,000 to Cesar Chavez Foundation · gave $2,000 to the campaign
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Robert Garcia Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $20,000 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($5,000) also gave $3,500 to their campaign; 1 source ($5,000) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Barona Band of Mission Indians ($5,000 to Corona Elementary; gave $3,500 to the campaign; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $5,000 to Corona Elementary · gave $3,500 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Sabrina P Cervantes Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $861,849 paid at their request since 2024: 18 sources ($405,349) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Highlands Community Charter & Technical Schools ($110,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation; lobbyist employer); Amarok ($35,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation; lobbyist employer); Novo Nordisk ($35,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation; lobbyist employer); Meta Platforms, Inc. ($30,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation; lobbyist employer); Vineyard Offshore LLC ($25,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Highlands Community Charter & Technical Schools paid $110,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Amarok paid $35,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Novo Nordisk paid $35,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Meta Platforms, Inc. paid $30,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Vineyard Offshore LLC paid $25,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Oportun, Inc paid $20,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Pfizer Inc. paid $15,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Wells Fargo & Company paid $15,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • E, & J. Gallo Winery paid $15,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Partnership for Health paid $15,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Snap Inc. paid $15,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Aera Energy LLC paid $15,000 to California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • and 6 more on the person's page
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Sade Elhawary Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $117,000 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($20,000) also gave $1,443 to their campaign; 1 source ($10,000) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation ($20,000 to Hector Meza Ismael, Kevin Zaldana; gave $1,443 to the campaign); Barona Band of Mission Indians ($10,000 to John Adams Middle School, St. Raphael School; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • California Latino Legislative Caucus Foundation paid $20,000 to Hector Meza Ismael, Kevin Zaldana, Marianna Luis-Galicia · gave $1,442.80 to the campaign
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $10,000 to John Adams Middle School, St. Raphael School · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Scott D Wiener Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $309,007 paid at their request since 2024: 10 sources ($155,682) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria ($35,000 to EQCA California C4; lobbyist employer); Salesforce ($21,683 to EQCA California C3, Equality Institute C3; lobbyist employer); DoorDash, Inc ($19,999 to Abundance Network Education (c3), EQCA California C4; lobbyist employer); Microsoft ($18,000 to EQCA California C4; lobbyist employer); Sutter Health ($15,000 to EQCA Institute C3; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria paid $35,000 to EQCA California C4 · registered lobbyist employer
  • Salesforce paid $21,683 to EQCA California C3, Equality Institute C3 · registered lobbyist employer
  • DoorDash, Inc paid $19,999 to Abundance Network Education (c3), EQCA California C4 · registered lobbyist employer
  • Microsoft paid $18,000 to EQCA California C4 · registered lobbyist employer
  • Sutter Health paid $15,000 to EQCA Institute C3 · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Federation of Teachers paid $12,500 to Equality California C4 · registered lobbyist employer
  • Airbnb paid $11,000 to EQCA California C4, Equality California C4 · registered lobbyist employer
  • Visa paid $10,000 to Equality California C4 · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Teachers Association paid $7,500 to Equality California C4 · registered lobbyist employer
  • National Union of Healthcare Workers paid $5,000 to EQCA California C4 · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Sharon Darlene Quirk-Silva Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $74,500 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($15,000) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Barona Band of Mission Indians ($15,000 to Centralia Elementary School, Fullerton Union High School; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $15,000 to Centralia Elementary School, Fullerton Union High School, Richman Elementary School · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Sonya Limon Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $1,045,167 paid at their request since 2024: 17 sources ($447,500) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Pacific Gas & Electric ($75,000 to Women in California Leadership; lobbyist employer); CA Correctional Peace Officers Association ($50,000 to Women in California Leadership; lobbyist employer); DaVita ($50,000 to Women in California Leadership; lobbyist employer); Pechanga Band of Indians ($35,000 to Women in California Leadership; lobbyist employer); Airbnb, Inc ($35,000 to Women in California Leadership; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Pacific Gas & Electric paid $75,000 to Women in California Leadership · registered lobbyist employer
  • CA Correctional Peace Officers Association paid $50,000 to Women in California Leadership · registered lobbyist employer
  • DaVita paid $50,000 to Women in California Leadership · registered lobbyist employer
  • Pechanga Band of Indians paid $35,000 to Women in California Leadership · registered lobbyist employer
  • Airbnb, Inc paid $35,000 to Women in California Leadership · registered lobbyist employer
  • Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians paid $30,000 to California Legislative Central Coast Caucus Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Personal Care Products Council paid $30,000 to Women in California Leadership · registered lobbyist employer
  • CA Nurses Association paid $25,000 to Women in California Leadership · registered lobbyist employer
  • Sutter Health paid $25,000 to Women in California Leadership · registered lobbyist employer
  • General Motors paid $20,000 to Women in California Leadership · registered lobbyist employer
  • Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. paid $15,000 to Women in California Leadership · registered lobbyist employer
  • Western Dental Services, Inc. paid $15,000 to Women in California Leadership · registered lobbyist employer
  • and 5 more on the person's page
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Stephanie Nguyen Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $422,929 paid at their request since 2024: 6 sources ($95,090) also gave $41,200 to their campaign; 11 sources ($171,090) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: VSP Vision ($47,090 to Asian Resources, Inc. (ARI), Health Education Council; gave $7,900 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); Chevron U.S.A., Inc. ($26,000 to Asian Pacific American Leadership Foundation, Equality California; lobbyist employer); DaVita ($15,000 to Health Education Council; lobbyist employer); The Doctors Management Company ($15,000 to Health Education Council; lobbyist employer); Meta Platforms, Inc. ($15,000 to Health Education Council; gave $5,900 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • VSP Vision paid $47,090 to Asian Resources, Inc. (ARI), Health Education Council · gave $7,900 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Chevron U.S.A., Inc. paid $26,000 to Asian Pacific American Leadership Foundation, Equality California, Health Education Council · registered lobbyist employer
  • DaVita paid $15,000 to Health Education Council · registered lobbyist employer
  • The Doctors Management Company paid $15,000 to Health Education Council · registered lobbyist employer
  • Meta Platforms, Inc. paid $15,000 to Health Education Council · gave $5,900 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Correctional Peace Officers Association paid $10,000 to Health Education Council · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Commerce Club, Inc. paid $10,000 to Health Education Council · gave $2,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Resources Corporation (CRC Services, LLC) paid $10,000 to Health Education Council · gave $5,900 to the campaign
  • Walmart INC. paid $10,000 to Health Education Council · gave $8,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • BlackRock Funds Services Group paid $10,000 to Health Education Council · registered lobbyist employer
  • CA Life Sciences paid $10,000 to Asian Pacific American Leadership Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • International Paper paid $3,000 to Health Education Council · gave $11,500 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Stephen A Bennett Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $24,000 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($10,000) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Barona Band of Mission Indians ($10,000 to Glen City Elementary School, Thelma Bedell Elementary School; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $10,000 to Glen City Elementary School, Thelma Bedell Elementary School · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Stephen C Padilla Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $63,000 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($5,000) also gave $3,500 to their campaign; 1 source ($5,000) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Barona Band of Mission Indians ($5,000 to Enrique Camarena, Jr. High School; gave $3,500 to the campaign; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $5,000 to Enrique Camarena, Jr. High School · gave $3,500 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Susan Rubio Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $276,400 paid at their request since 2024: 4 sources ($20,900) also gave $19,400 to their campaign; 4 sources ($20,900) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians ($5,900 to YWCA of San Gabriel Valley; gave $5,900 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); Barona Band of Mission Indians ($5,000 to Coronado Alternative High School; lobbyist employer); California Broadband and Video Association ($5,000 to God's Pantry; gave $1,000 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); Niagara Bottling ($5,000 to God's Pantry; lobbyist employer); Athens Services ($5,000 to God's Pantry; gave $5,500 to the campaign); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians paid $5,900 to YWCA of San Gabriel Valley · gave $5,900 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $5,000 to Coronado Alternative High School · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Broadband and Video Association paid $5,000 to God's Pantry · gave $1,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Niagara Bottling paid $5,000 to God's Pantry · registered lobbyist employer
  • Athens Services paid $5,000 to God's Pantry · gave $5,500 to the campaign
  • NextEra Energy Resources paid $5,000 to God's Pantry · gave $7,000 to the campaign
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Suzette Martinez Valladares Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $1,169,610 paid at their request since 2024: 18 sources ($374,000) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Altria Client Services, LLC ($105,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation, Hispanic Legislative Caucus; lobbyist employer); California Broadband and Video Association ($50,000 to California Hispanic Legislative Caucus; lobbyist employer); Phillips 66 ($30,000 to California Problem Solvers Action Fund, California Problem Solvers Foundation; lobbyist employer); PMI US Corporate Services ($25,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation; lobbyist employer); Western States Petroleum Association ($25,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Altria Client Services, LLC paid $105,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation, Hispanic Legislative Caucus · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Broadband and Video Association paid $50,000 to California Hispanic Legislative Caucus · registered lobbyist employer
  • Phillips 66 paid $30,000 to California Problem Solvers Action Fund, California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • PMI US Corporate Services paid $25,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Western States Petroleum Association paid $25,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Turo Inc paid $15,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Coinbase paid $15,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • ONE CALL paid $15,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • American Career College paid $15,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • The Doctors Management Company paid $15,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • DAVITA INC. paid $10,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Dart Container paid $10,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • and 6 more on the person's page
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Tasha Nicolle Boerner Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $39,530 paid at their request since 2024: 2 sources ($12,500) also gave $16,900 to their campaign; 1 source ($10,000) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Barona Band of Mission Indians ($10,000 to Cabrillo Elementary, Washington Elementary School; gave $11,800 to the campaign; lobbyist employer); Cox Communications ($2,500 to Boys & Girls Club of Northwest San Diego; gave $5,100 to the campaign).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $10,000 to Cabrillo Elementary, Washington Elementary School · gave $11,800 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
  • Cox Communications paid $2,500 to Boys & Girls Club of Northwest San Diego · gave $5,100 to the campaign
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Tri D Ta Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $114,695 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($10,000) also gave $5,900 to their campaign; 1 source ($10,000) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Meta Platforms, Inc. ($10,000 to Quang Tri Victory Foundation; gave $5,900 to the campaign; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Meta Platforms, Inc. paid $10,000 to Quang Tri Victory Foundation · gave $5,900 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Dennis K Seyarto Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $5,000 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($5,000) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Meta Platforms, Inc. ($5,000 to Milvet; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Meta Platforms, Inc. paid $5,000 to Milvet · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Anthony Rendon Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $104,114 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($71,114) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Olson Remcho, LLP ($71,114 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Olson Remcho, LLP paid $71,114 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Brian K Maienschein Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $5,000 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($5,000) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Barona Band of Mission Indians ($5,000 to Westwood Elementary School; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $5,000 to Westwood Elementary School · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Carlos Villapudua Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $38,000 paid at their request since 2024: 2 sources ($15,000) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: California Charter Schools Association ($10,000 to California Problem Solvers Action Fund; lobbyist employer); Barona Band of Mission Indians ($5,000 to Oakwood Elementary; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • California Charter Schools Association paid $10,000 to California Problem Solvers Action Fund · registered lobbyist employer
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $5,000 to Oakwood Elementary · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Christopher R Holden Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $42,058 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($32,058) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Olson Remcho, LLP ($32,058 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Olson Remcho, LLP paid $32,058 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Cottie Ann Petrie-Norris Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $5,000 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($5,000) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Vineyard Offshore ($5,000 to Girls Inc. of Orange County; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Vineyard Offshore paid $5,000 to Girls Inc. of Orange County · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Damon M Connolly Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $71,113 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($71,113) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Olson Remcho, LLP ($71,113 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Olson Remcho, LLP paid $71,113 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Gregory Robert Wallis Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $5,000 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($5,000) also gave $7,000 to their campaign; 1 source ($5,000) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Barona Band of Mission Indians ($5,000 to La Quinta Middle School STEM Academy; gave $7,000 to the campaign; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $5,000 to La Quinta Middle School STEM Academy · gave $7,000 to the campaign · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Janet Nguyen Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $19,500 paid at their request since 2024: 2 sources ($15,000) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: California Apartment Association ($10,000 to Central County Foundation, Inc; lobbyist employer); Barona Band of Mission Indians ($5,000 to A.E Arnold Elementary School; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • California Apartment Association paid $10,000 to Central County Foundation, Inc · registered lobbyist employer
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $5,000 to A.E Arnold Elementary School · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Joshua Botts Newman Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $17,878 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($10,000) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: California Charter Schools Association ($10,000 to California Problem Solvers Caucus Action Fund; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • California Charter Schools Association paid $10,000 to California Problem Solvers Caucus Action Fund · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Luz Maria Rivas Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $179,000 paid at their request since 2024: 4 sources ($25,000) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Crown Castle ($10,000 to DIY Girls; lobbyist employer); Dart Container ($5,000 to Los Angeles County Delegation Foundation; lobbyist employer); Metropolitan Water District of Southern California ($5,000 to DIY Girls; lobbyist employer); Amazon.com Services, Inc ($5,000 to DIY Girls; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Crown Castle paid $10,000 to DIY Girls · registered lobbyist employer
  • Dart Container paid $5,000 to Los Angeles County Delegation Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Metropolitan Water District of Southern California paid $5,000 to DIY Girls · registered lobbyist employer
  • Amazon.com Services, Inc paid $5,000 to DIY Girls · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Marie Waldron Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $11,000 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($5,000) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Barona Band of Mission Indians ($5,000 to Potrero Elementary School; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $5,000 to Potrero Elementary School · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Nancy Skinner Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $1,247,114 paid at their request since 2024: 21 sources ($583,614) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Silicon Valley Community Foundation ($125,000 to Women in California Leadership; lobbyist employer); Olson Remcho, LLP ($71,114 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta; lobbyist employer); Salesforce ($50,000 to Women in California Leadership; lobbyist employer); CA Teachers Association ($50,000 to Women in California Leadership; lobbyist employer); General Motors ($40,000 to Women in California Leadership; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Silicon Valley Community Foundation paid $125,000 to Women in California Leadership · registered lobbyist employer
  • Olson Remcho, LLP paid $71,114 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta · registered lobbyist employer
  • Salesforce paid $50,000 to Women in California Leadership · registered lobbyist employer
  • CA Teachers Association paid $50,000 to Women in California Leadership · registered lobbyist employer
  • General Motors paid $40,000 to Women in California Leadership · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Faculty Association paid $35,000 to Women in California Leadership · registered lobbyist employer
  • Early Care and Education Consortium, Inc. paid $35,000 to Women in California Leadership · registered lobbyist employer
  • Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California paid $27,500 to Women in California Leadership · registered lobbyist employer
  • Vineyard Offshore paid $20,000 to Women in California Leadership · registered lobbyist employer
  • Sysco Corporation paid $15,000 to Women in California Leadership · registered lobbyist employer
  • CVS Health paid $15,000 to Women in California Leadership · registered lobbyist employer
  • Calpine Corporation paid $15,000 to Women in California Leadership · registered lobbyist employer
  • and 9 more on the person's page
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Phil Y Ting Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $89,114 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($71,114) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Olson Remcho, LLP ($71,114 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Olson Remcho, LLP paid $71,114 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Reginald B Jones-Sawyer Assembly Member, State Assembly

Context Behested payments

Of $32,058 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($32,058) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: OLSON REMCHO, LLP ($32,058 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • OLSON REMCHO, LLP paid $32,058 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Richard Roth Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $5,000 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($5,000) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS ($5,000 to MISSION BELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS paid $5,000 to MISSION BELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Scott T Wilk Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $25,000 paid at their request since 2024: 3 sources ($25,000) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: California Charter Schools Association ($10,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation; lobbyist employer); California Chamber of Commerce ($10,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation; lobbyist employer); Barona Band of Mission Indians ($5,000 to Excelsior Charter School; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • California Charter Schools Association paid $10,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Chamber of Commerce paid $10,000 to California Problem Solvers Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $5,000 to Excelsior Charter School · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Steven Bradford Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $137,058 paid at their request since 2024: 3 sources ($52,058) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Olson Remcho, LLP ($32,058 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta; lobbyist employer); California Broadband & Video Association ($15,000 to Charitable Funds Benefitting Gardena; lobbyist employer); Barona Band of Mission Indians ($5,000 to Broad Avenue Elementary School; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Olson Remcho, LLP paid $32,058 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Broadband & Video Association paid $15,000 to Charitable Funds Benefitting Gardena · registered lobbyist employer
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $5,000 to Broad Avenue Elementary School · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Susan T Eggman Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $44,000 paid at their request since 2024: 1 source ($10,000) is a registered lobbyist employer

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Barona Band of Mission Indians ($10,000 to California LGBTQ Foundation; lobbyist employer).

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Barona Band of Mission Indians paid $10,000 to California LGBTQ Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Toni G Atkins Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $1,095,464 paid at their request since 2024: 27 sources ($364,504) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Olson Remcho, LLP ($71,114 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta; lobbyist employer); California Federation of Teachers ($50,000 to Equality California; lobbyist employer); Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria ($35,000 to Equality California; lobbyist employer); Port of Long Beach ($25,000 to Equality California; lobbyist employer); Microsoft ($18,000 to Equality California; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Olson Remcho, LLP paid $71,114 to Amicus Brief in State Public Defender v. Bonta · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Federation of Teachers paid $50,000 to Equality California · registered lobbyist employer
  • Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria paid $35,000 to Equality California · registered lobbyist employer
  • Port of Long Beach paid $25,000 to Equality California · registered lobbyist employer
  • Microsoft paid $18,000 to Equality California · registered lobbyist employer
  • Intuit paid $16,000 to Equality California · registered lobbyist employer
  • National Union of Healthcare Workers paid $12,000 to Equality California · registered lobbyist employer
  • East West Bank paid $12,000 to Equality California · registered lobbyist employer
  • Cruise paid $10,000 to Equality California · registered lobbyist employer
  • Visa paid $10,000 to Equality California · registered lobbyist employer
  • Accenture paid $10,000 to Equality California · registered lobbyist employer
  • California Apartment Association paid $10,000 to Equality California · registered lobbyist employer
  • and 13 more on the person's page
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

William H Dodd Senator, State Senate

Context Behested payments

Of $465,000 paid at their request since 2024: 16 sources ($185,000) are registered lobbyist employers

Payments made at their request (Form 803) from sources that also appear in Cal-Access: Pacific Gas and Electric Company ($40,000 to Napa Valley Community Foundation; lobbyist employer); Amazon.com Services LLC ($25,000 to Napa Valley Community Foundation; lobbyist employer); Uber Technologies, Inc. ($20,000 to Napa Valley Community Foundation; lobbyist employer); Hollywood Park Casino Company ($15,000 to Napa Valley Community Foundation; lobbyist employer); Anheuser Busch Companies ($15,000 to Napa Valley Community Foundation; lobbyist employer); and more.

What to check
  • Context: behested payments are legal and public; this puts two public records side by side.
  • Whether the official later acted on matters involving these sources.
  • The full Form 803 reports (available from the FPPC on request).
  • Pacific Gas and Electric Company paid $40,000 to Napa Valley Community Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Amazon.com Services LLC paid $25,000 to Napa Valley Community Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Uber Technologies, Inc. paid $20,000 to Napa Valley Community Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Hollywood Park Casino Company paid $15,000 to Napa Valley Community Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Anheuser Busch Companies paid $15,000 to Napa Valley Community Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • DoorDash, Inc. paid $10,000 to Napa Valley Community Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • National Union of Healthcare Workers paid $10,000 to Napa Valley Community Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • CAL FIRE local 2881 paid $10,000 to Napa Valley Community Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • PBF Holding Company LLC paid $5,000 to Napa Valley Community Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • Pacaso paid $5,000 to Napa Valley Community Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • American Airlines paid $5,000 to Napa Valley Community Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • T Mobile paid $5,000 to Napa Valley Community Foundation · registered lobbyist employer
  • and 4 more on the person's page
Rule: Behested payments from donors or lobbyist employers
“Unlike gifts and contributions, there are no limits on the amount of payments an official may behest.”FPPC, Reporting Behested Payments – Form 803 ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works